The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Carl Alwmark

Carl Alwmark

Senior lecturer

Carl Alwmark

Fossil insect eyes shed light on trilobite optics and the arthropod pigment screen

Author

  • Johan Lindgren
  • Dan Eric Nilsson
  • Peter Sjövall
  • Martin Jarenmark
  • Shosuke Ito
  • Kazumasa Wakamatsu
  • Benjamin P. Kear
  • Bo Pagh Schultz
  • René Lyng Sylvestersen
  • Henrik Madsen
  • James R. LaFountain
  • Carl Alwmark
  • Mats E. Eriksson
  • Stephen A. Hall
  • Paula Lindgren
  • Irene Rodríguez-Meizoso
  • Per Ahlberg

Summary, in English

Fossilized eyes permit inferences of the visual capacity of extinct arthropods1–3. However, structural and/or chemical modifications as a result of taphonomic and diagenetic processes can alter the original features, thereby necessitating comparisons with modern species. Here we report the detailed molecular composition and microanatomy of the eyes of 54-million-year-old crane-flies, which together provide a proxy for the interpretation of optical systems in some other ancient arthropods. These well-preserved visual organs comprise calcified corneal lenses that are separated by intervening spaces containing eumelanin pigment. We also show that eumelanin is present in the facet walls of living crane-flies, in which it forms the outermost ommatidial pigment shield in compound eyes incorporating a chitinous cornea. To our knowledge, this is the first record of melanic screening pigments in arthropods, and reveals a fossilization mode in insect eyes that involves a decay-resistant biochrome coupled with early diagenetic mineralization of the ommatidial lenses. The demonstrable secondary calcification of lens cuticle that was initially chitinous has implications for the proposed calcitic corneas of trilobites, which we posit are artefacts of preservation rather than a product of in vivo biomineralization4–7. Although trilobite eyes might have been partly mineralized for mechanical strength, a (more likely) organic composition would have enhanced function via gradient-index optics and increased control of lens shape.

Department/s

  • Department of Geology
  • Molecular Ecology and Evolution Lab
  • Department of Construction Sciences
  • Biotechnology

Publishing year

2019-01-01

Language

English

Pages

122-125

Publication/Series

Nature

Volume

573

Document type

Journal article (letter)

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

Topic

  • Geology
  • Geochemistry
  • Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Status

Published

Research group

  • Molecular Ecology and Evolution Lab

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0028-0836